The truth of the matter is human beings have been interdimensional creatures from the very beginning. Faith or religion is one dimension where individuals interact, through prayer or other means, with Beings who exist in another dimension of reality. You can't see it, or touch it, but it's no less real to you.
Anytime you share interaction that involves your brain alone, and not your physical body, you are engaging in activities that involve another dimension of reality. It's no less real to you, so why do some draw a separation between digital interactions and concrete reality, or "meatspace" interactions?
You read a story in a book and it allows your imagination to roam, and sometimes it causes you to think about certain things or come away with certain feelings. Is that not real? Do you not feel it?
You read something in the newspaper or a magazine, especially something which elicits an opinion from its readers. Is the opinion you form any less real?
You talk to someone on the telephone who is a state away, or even half a world away. Is that person real? Is your interaction with them any less real than if they were standing right in front of you?
There are many ways that we take our brains where our physical bodies can't go, and the experiences are no less real than if you can reach out and touch them with your fingertips, smell the smells, and see the sights. Those spaces in our lives are just different dimensions of our reality and the reality we share with others.
Just where did people get the cockeyed notion that having an experience in digital reality is "not" real? Isn't the Internet somewhere you take your brain where your physical body cannot go? Do you check your feelings at the door, or do they go with you, and influence you on your "journey"? What about your opinions and beliefs - do you check those at the door or do they go with you?
I maintain that no matter where you go and have experiences - whether it's a place you can actually walk/talk/smell/taste/touch or whether it's another medium - it's a dimension of reality and often a reality that others (in mass quantities) share.
In fact - when the facade of flesh and all we do with it to either communicate or mask who we really are has been stripped - the true person underneath comes to the surface where others can see it. Your true values, how you view others, the basis and motivations of your choices, are there under the glaring microscope with nowhere to hide. People use the various artifices of physical reality to impose layers, like an onion, between themselves and the rest of the world they are in contact with. When you step away from the physical, and enter the digital, those layers are stripped away. You must learn and employ a completely new skillset to express yourself in this space. Even so, it is impossible to completely hide you and your true motivations from others sharing that reality.
I often say that a person's true beliefs and motivations are magnified tenfold in digital space, and I say that because all those layers we use to shield ourselves in meatspace have been stripped away. The playing field is leveled. It doesn't matter how rich, poor, young, old, wise, or uneducated you are - everyone is thrown into this space and their true natures come out.
You are presented with choices that you haven't faced since you were very very young. How will you present yourself? Will you "own" your values and motivations, or try to distance yourself from them? If you try to distance yourself, it becomes glaringly obvious to all of those you interact with, and they see you as dishonest about yourself. Judgment is harsh and swift in digital space and forces you to either own up to what is at your core or be ostracized by those who see you as less than credible. Then again - others who choose to be less than credible may choose to band with you, because that becomes a shared value.
Honor amongst thieves? Hardly. If a person is motivated to take advantage of others for personal gain, they won't stop once they hit digital space. They may learn ways to temporarily obfuscate their true intentions, but in the end, they will be "found out". Because digital space is limitless, they will move on to the next group of unsuspecting people, but their behavior won't change, and they will be condemned to a digital life of nomadism.
Virtual reality is probably the closest thing to meatspace interaction. You can create a 3-dimensional "avatar" and use it to showcase the person you feel that you are. For some, they try to represent their human selves; for others, they see it as a place where they can open up and express parts of themselves that they can't fully express in a physical environment. You will find all sorts of "personalities" there - from plain human beings, all the way up to abstract expression, and everywhere inbetween.
None of it is any less real than the desk you're resting your wrists on as you type. If you insist that it's somehow NOT real then ask yourself if the events that occur in your mind on a daily basis are real, because they can't be touched/smelled/tasted/heard any more than interaction in virtual space.
You are who you are, no matter where your mind wanders. Don't make the mistake of classifying virtual/digital space is "unreal" in an excuse to treat other human beings with anything less than common consideration. That's a faulty viewpoint and one which cannot be used to justify the abuse of others.